Title

THE PLACE OF CARNIVAL IN THE CONTEXT OF MIKHAIL BAKHTIN’S PHILOSOPHY

Author(s)

Sergeiy Sandler

Information about the author(s)

Sergeiy Sandler, PhD in Philosophy, an independent scholar. David Niv 21/19, Beer Sheva 8425625, Israel. E-mail: sergeiys@ gmail.com

Received

September 18, 2016

Published

December 25, 2016

Issue

№3-4

Department

Literary Theory

Pages

10--28

DOI

DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2016-1-3-4-10-28

UDK

УДК 1(091) + 82.0

BBK

ББК 87.3(2)6 + 83

Abstract

The role that Mikhail Bakhtin’s book on Rabelais, and the carnival theme more generally, plays in Bakhtin’s philosophy is a perennial concern in Bakhtin studies. Indeed, how would one reconcile such ideas as the carnival crowd, the unclear boundaries of the human body in grotesque imagery, or the notion of a collective ancestral body, with Bakhtin’s personalism, his emphasis on the impossibility of merging self and other into one? However, Bakhtin himself did not see these notions as incompatible. We find them not only separately, in works from different periods, but also adjacently, for example in the 2 nd edition of his book on Dostoevsky. In this paper, I attempt to reconstruct the philosophical context, in which carnival appears in Bakhtin’s work and to place carnival within the development of Bakhtin’s aesthetics. I follow the process in which Bakhtin’s aesthetics and theory of the novel developed from an early focus on the human image examined from another’s point of view, to the carnivalesque image, dominated by the perspective of the I-for-myself. At the heart of this process stands Bakhtin’s study of how the image of a free and creative individual has been forged in world literature. When we compare the aesthetic views and evaluations espoused by Bakhtin in different periods, we sometimes find sharp reversals in his position. Nevertheless, these reversals are part of a continuous process of development in what can rightly be seen as essentially the same philosophical conception that informs Bakhtin’s work in all periods.

Keywords

Mikhail Bakhtin, Carnival, personalism, theory of the novel, aesthetics.

Works cited

1 Bakhtin M. M. Besedy s V. D. Duvakinym. 2-e izd. [Bakhtin M. M. Conversations with V. D. Duvakin, 2 nd edition]. Moscow, Soglasie Publ., 2002. 398 p. (In Russ.) 2 Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenij v 7 t. [Bakhtin M. M. Collected writings in 7 vols.] Moscow, Russkie Slovari Publ. and Jazyki Slavjanskih Kul’tur Publ., 1996–2012. (In Russ.): Vol. 1: Filosofskaja estetika 1920-h godov, otv. red. S. G. Bocharov, N. I. Nikolaev. [Vol. 1: Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s. Eds. S. G. Bocharov, N. I. Nikolaev]. Moscow, 2003. 958 p. Vol. 2: “Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo,” 1929. Stat’i o L. Tolstom, 1929. Zapisi kursa lekcij po istorii russkoj literatury, 1922–1927, Otv. red. S. G. Bocharov, L. S. Melihova. [Problems of Dostoevsky’s work, 1929. Essays on L. Tolstoy, 1929. Notes from a lecture course on the history of Russian literature, 1922– 1927, ed. S. G. Bocharov, L. S. Melihova]. Moscow, 2000. 798 p. Vol. 3: Teorija romana (1930–1961 gg.), otv. red. S. G. Bocharov, V. V. Kozhinov. [Vol. 3: Theory of the novel (1930–1961). Eds. S. G. Bocharov, V. V. Kozhinov]. Moscow, 2012. 880 p. Vol. 4(1): “Fransua Rable v istorii realizma” (1940 g.). Materialy k knige o Rable (1930– 1950-e gg.). Kommentarii i prilozhenija, otv. red. I. L. Popova. [Fran?ois Rabelais in the history of realism (1940). Working notes for the book on Rabelais (1930s — 1950s). Commentary and appendices. Ed. I. L. Popova]. Moscow, 2008. 1120 p. Vol. 4 (2): Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul’tura srednevekov’ja i renessansa (1965 g.). Rable i Gogol’ (iskusstvo slova i narodnaja smehovaja kul’tura) (1940, 1970 gg.). Kommentarii i prilozhenie. Ukazateli, otv. red. I. L. Popova. [Vol. 4 (2): The work of Fran?ois Rabelais and the popular culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance (1965). Rabelais and Gogol: Verbal art and popular humor (1940, 1970). Commentary and appendix. Ed. I. L. Popova]. Moscow, 2010. 752 p. Vol. 5: Raboty 1940-h — nachala 1960-h godov, otv. red. S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili. [Vol. 5: Works from the 1940s through the early 1960s. Eds. S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili]. Moscow, 1996. 731 p. Vol. 6: “Problemy pojetiki Dostoevskogo,” 1963. Raboty 1960-h — 1970-h gg., otv. red. S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili. [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics, 1963. Works from the 1960s — 1970s. Eds. S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili]. Moscow, 2002. 800 p. 3 Kierkegaard S. Zakljuchitel’noe nenauchnoe posleslovie k “filosofskim kroham” [Concluding unscientific postscript to Philosophical fragments]. St. Petersburg, Russia, Saint Petersburg University Publ., 2005. 680 p. (In Russ.) 4 Nikolaev N. I. [Vstupitel’naja zametka k publikacii]: Lekcii i vystuplenija M. M. Bahtina 1924–1925 gg. v zapisjah L. V. Pumpjanskogo [Introductory notes, M. M. Bakhtin’s lectures Studia Litterarum. Том 1, № 3–4 Теория литературы 28 and comments of 1924–1925: From the notebooks of L. V. Pumpiansky]. M. M. Bahtin kak filosof [M. M. Bakhtin as a philosopher]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992, pp. 221–232. (In Russ.) 5 Fridman I. N. Karnaval v odinochku [A carnival for one]. Voprosy filosofii [Philosophical issues]. 1994, no 12, pp. 79–89. (In Russ.) 6 Fryszman A. O Serene K’erkegore i Mihaile Bahtine “s postojannoj ssylkoj na Sokrata” [On S?ren Kierkegaard and Mikhail

Full version of the article