Home>>Archive>>Back
|
Title |
THE NON-(POST)CLASSICAL WORLDVIEW IN NATIONAL LITERARY HISTORY: R. AKHMETZYANOV’S LYRICS |
|
Author(s) |
Vera R. Amineva |
|
Information about the author(s) |
Vera R. Amineva, DSc in Philology, Аssociate Рrofessor, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 18, 420008 Kazan, Russia. E-mail: amineva1000@list.ru |
|
Received |
28.10.2016 |
|
Published |
|
|
Issue |
3--4 |
|
Department |
Literature of the Peoples of Russia |
|
Pages |
278-297 |
|
DOI |
DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2016-1-3-4-278-297 |
|
UDK |
УДК 82.01/.09 |
|
BBK |
ББК 83.3(2Рос=Тат) |
|
Abstract |
The article was written with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Humanites (project no 16-14-16010). Abstract: The article examines subjective architectonics in the work of the Tatar poet R. Akhmetzyanov’s (1935–2008) seeing it as a medium that discloses peculiar post-classical paradigm in the Tatar lyrics of the 1960–1680s. The object of analysis is a series of poems representing various thematic aspects. Using these poems as а case study, the paper aims to to achieve theoretical understanding of the role avant-garde played in the renewal of the Tatar literature in this period. The author employs a systematic structural methodology: an individual work is seen as a solid artistic system that develops a solid worldview representing a specific aesthetic concept of reality. The essay claims that in love poetry, there is a certain parallelism that ensues an open world model that includes: the autonomy of the “I” and the “you,” the protagonist’s desire to get closer to “her,” and the achievement of the otherworldly and passive unity with the beloved. In poems addressing national and sociocultural problems, the protagonists and those he calls “we” (children and the country) form a liaison that knows not subjective borders. Existential interpenetration of the “I” and the “we” reflects the process of the protagonist’s selfidentification. In a number of works, there is a peculiar super-protagonist whose relation to the world of the “I” is that of un-engagement and transcendence. The dialogue of the “I” with this transcendent position has a structure-forming function in that it reveals the peculiarities of self-apprehension and self-identification of the protagonist. Subjective neo-syncretism corresponds with the special structure of the verbal image and the employment of both mythopoetic language and tropes that interact with each other dialogically. The principle of poetic and figurative architectonics is associated with the law of polygenres and polystylistics responsible for the integrity of the analyzed works. |
|
Keywords |
Tatar lyrics, avant-garde, figurative languages, subjective sphere, composition, architectonics. |
|
Works cited |
1 Amineva V. R. Tipy dialogicheskikh otnoshenii mezhdu natsional’nymi literaturami (na materiale proizvedenii russkikh pisatelei vtoroi poloviny XIX v. i tatarskikh prozaikov pervoi treti XX v.) [Types of dialogical relations between national literatures (on the material of works by Russian authors of the second half of the 19 th century and the Tatar fiction writers of the first third of the 20 th century)]. Kazan, Kazan. gos. un-t Publ., 2010. 476 p. (In Russ.) 2 Amineva V. R. Obraznye iazyki avangardnoi liriki [Figurative languages of the avant- garde lyrics]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice]. Tambov, Gramota Publ. 2015, no 4, part 2, pp. 32–35. (In Russ.) 3 Broitman S. N. Istoricheskaia poetika [Historical poetics]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2001. 320 p. (In Russ.) 4 Broitman S. N. Poetika russkoi klassicheskoi i neklassicheskoi liriki [Poetics of the Russian classical and nonclassical lyrics]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2008. 485 p. (In Russ.) 5 Ganieva R. K. Tatarskaia literatura: traditsii, vzaimosviazi [Tatar literature: traditions, interrelations]. Kazan’, Izd-vo KGU Publ, 2002. 272 p. (In Russ.) 6 Gachev G. D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira: Kurs lektsii [National images of the world: Course of lectures]. Moscow, Izd. tsentr “Akademiia” Publ., 1998. 432 p. (In Russ.) 7 Gete I. V. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works] v 10 t. Moscow, Khudozh. lit. Publ., 1976. Vol. 2. 512 p. (In Russ.) 8 Ginzburg L. Ia. O lirike [About lyrics]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1997. 408 p. (In Russ.) 9 Girin Y. Kartina mira epokhi avangarda. Avangard kak sistemnaia tselostnost’ [Avant- garde worldview. Avant-garde as a system integrity]. Moscow, IWL RAS, 2013. 400 p. (In Russ.) 10 Zagidullina D. F. Avangard v tatarskoi literature 1960–1980 gg.: prichiny vozniknoveniia i natsional’nye osobennosti [Avant-garde in the Tatar literature of the 1960–80s: premises and national peculiarities]. Filologiia i kul’tura [Philology and Culture], 2014, no 2 (36), pp. 126–129. (In Russ.) 11 Zagidullina D. F. Modernizm v tatarskoi literature pervoi treti XX veka [Modernism in the Tatar literature of the first third of the 20 th Century]. Kazan, Tatar. kn. izd-vo Publ., 2013. 207 p. (In Russ.) Studia Litterarum. Том 1, № 3–4 Литература народов России 296 12 Zagidullina D. F., Iusupova N. M. Tatarskaia literature XX v. [Tatar literature of the 20 th Century: in 2 vols.]: v 2 kn. Kazan, Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta Publ., 2011. Kn. 2: Tatarskaia literatura vtoroi poloviny XX v. [Tatar literature of the second half of the 20 th Century]. 198 p. (In Russ.) 13 Korman B. O. Izbrannye trudy. Teoriia literatury [Selected works. Literary theory]. Izhevsk, In-t komp’iuternykh issledovanii Publ., 2006. 552 p. (In Russ.) 14 Kurbanmamadov A. Esteticheskaia doktrina sufizma (opyt kriticheskogo analiza) [Aesthetic doctrine of Sufism (critical analysis)]. Dushanbe, Izd-vo “Donish” Publ., 1987. 108 p. (In Russ.) 15 Levi-Briul’ L. Sverkh”estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii [Supernatural in primitive thinking]. Moscow, OGIZ Publ., 1937. 533 p. (In Russ.) 16 Lotman Y. M. V shkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol’ [At school of the poetic word: Pushkin, Lermontov, and Gogol]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1988. 352 p. (In Russ.) 17 Saiapova A. M. Dardmend i problema simvolizma v tatarskoi literature [Dardmend and the problem of symbolism in the Tatar literature]. Kazan, Izd-vo “Alma-Lit” Publ., 2006. 246p. (In Russ.) 18 Sitdikova A. F. Kognitivnoe issledovanie tsvetovogo prostranstva v tatarskom iazyke: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Cognitive research of a color space in Tatar language: Author. Dis. ... PhD Philology sciences]. Kazan, 2013. 22 p. (In Russ.) 19 Khan A. Poeticheskaia vselennaia. Analiz stikhotvoreniia B. Pasternaka “Opredelenie poezii”: predvaritel’nye itogi k analizu tsikla “Zaniat’e filosofiei” [Poetic Universe. Analysis of the poem “Definition of poetry” by B. Pasternak: preliminary results to the analysis of the cycle “The study of philosophy”]. Studia Russica XIX. Budapesht, 2001, pp. 169–188. (In Russ.) 20 Khanzen-Leve A. Russkii simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Mifopoeticheskii simvolizm. Kosmicheskaia simvolika [Russian symbolism. System of poetic motifs. Mythopoetic symbolism. Space symbolics]. St. Petersburg, Akadem. proekt Publ., 2003. 816 p. (In Russ.) 21 Shimmel’ A. Mir islamskogo mistitsizma [The world of Islamic mysticism]. Moscow, Aleteia, Enigma Publ., 2000. 416 p. (In Russ.) 22 Iung K. G. Dusha i mif: shest’ arkhetipov [Soul and myth: six archetypes]. Kiev, Gos. biblioteka Ukrainy dlia iunoshestva Publ., 1996. 384 p. (In Russ.) 23 G. Tukay’s poetry: the aspects of national identity. V. R. Amineva, M. I. Ibragimov, E. F. Nagumanova, A. Z. Khabibullina. XLinguae European Scientific Language Journal. 2015, vol. 8, Issue 1, January, pp. 79–87. 24 Zagidullina D., Amineva V. Avant-Garde Research in the Field of Verse Forms (based on I. Yuzeev lyrics). XLinguae European Scientific Language Journal. 2016, vol. 9, Issue 1, January, pp. 135–145. 25 Galiullin T. Shig “riiattә үz bieklege bar! [The height is in poetry!] Ildar Iuzeev: istәleklәr, әңgәmәlәr, shigyr’lәr [Ildar Yuzeev: memoirs, conversations, verses]. Kazan, Tatar. kit. neshr. Publ., 2008, pp. 172–176. (In Tatar.) Studia Litterarum. Vol. 1, no 3–4 Venera R. Amineva 297 26 Zaһidullina D. Robert Әkhmәtҗanov iҗaty: abstrakt obrazlylyk [Robert Akhmet- zhanov’s creativity: abstract figurativeness]. Fәnni Tatarstan, 2014, no 3, pp. 41–53. (In Tatar.) 27 Әkhmәtҗanov R. Khәter elgasy. Shigyr’lәr, balladalar, poemalar [The river of memory. Verses, ballads, poems]. Kazan, Tat. kit. nәshr. Publ., 1980. 320 p. (In Tatar.) 28 Әkhmәtҗanov R. V. Gomer tirәge: Shigyrҗlәr, poemalar [Tree of life: verses, poems]. Kazan, Tatar. kit. nәshr. Publ., 1985. 240 p. (In Tatar.) 29 Әkhmәtҗanov R. V. Orchyk җyry: Shigyr’lәr, balladalar [Song of spindles: Verses, ballads]. Kazan, Tatar. kit. nәshr. Publ., 1988. 144 p. (In Tatar.) |
|
|